Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
112
Highlights
35
Differences
5
Reactions
0
Likes
Anker 313
vs
Anker 735 Nano 2:
112 Highlights & 35 Differences —
So, Which Charger Actually Works Better
Find out which charger will future-proof your setup with enhanced output and durability.
What sets Anker 313 apart from Anker 735 Nano 2? This chargers face-off compares specs like usb-c ports, cable length, width & height and beyond.
Plug Insertion Cycles: High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
with 3 points higher
Comparing the Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2: Compact Chargers for Every Need
When it comes to portable charging solutions, the Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2 stand out as two highly efficient GaN-based chargers designed primarily for indoor use and beginner users. Both products deliver consistent charging performance coupled with premium build quality and multi-layer safety features, ensuring your devices remain protected.
However, they diverge significantly in power output, port availability, and device compatibility, making each suitable for different charging scenarios. The Anker 313 offers a compact, pocket-sized form factor with 45W maximum power ideal for phones and tablets, while the Anker 735 Nano 2 ramps up power to 65W and provides multiple ports, addressing the needs of users who require simultaneous charging of phones, tablets, and even laptops.
If portability and affordability top your list, the Anker 313 is an excellent choice. Weighing only 0.21 lbs and boasting a slim profile classified as pocket-sized, it easily slips into your bag or pocket without adding bulk. Despite its tiny footprint, it punches above its weight with a stable 45W maximum output, which is ample for charging smartphones and tablets quickly and safely. Its GaN technology ensures efficient heat dispersion through passive means, coupled with a high heat management efficiency, so it stays cool without noisy fans.
Beyond power, the Anker 313 incorporates multi-layer safety redundancy and fire protection, providing peace of mind during daily charging. While it lacks multi-device charging capability, it only supports one device at a time, it includes both USB-C and USB-A ports, enabling compatibility with a variety of cables and devices. The charger's design includes external cable management and a straightforward plug orientation, making it user-friendly and travel-ready. For those looking for an effective, no-frills charger at an affordable price point, the Anker 313, available for roughly $19.99 at amazon.com, is a compelling bargain.
The Strength of Anker 735 Nano 2: Versatile, Powerful, and Durable
The Anker 735 Nano 2 caters to users who demand greater power and flexibility from their chargers. Delivering a substantial 65W max output, this charger easily handles power-hungry devices such as laptops in addition to phones and tablets. Its tri-port setup (two USB-C and one USB-A) supports charging multiple devices simultaneously, a major advantage for busy users juggling smartphones, tablets, and laptops.
The 735 Nano 2's robust design includes a drop resistance rating of 3, adding reassuring durability that the Anker 313 does not claim. Additionally, the charger boasts a higher thermal throttling threshold of 176°F compared to the Anker 313's 104°F, allowing it to maintain performance under heavier loads better. Its instant protection response time further enhances safety, making it a reliable everyday charger.
Though slightly larger and heavier (0.31 lbs) than the Anker 313, it remains compact and travel-friendly. The unit lacks LED indicators and interchangeable plugs, similar to its smaller sibling, but it compensates by supporting universal cross-brand compatibility, including laptop charging, a feature missing from the Anker 313. Price-wise, the 735 Nano 2 commands about double, around $39.99 at Amazon.com, justified by its powerful performance and multi-device support.
Quick Take
The Anker 313 wins hearts as a budget-friendly, pocket-sized charger perfectly tailored for phone and tablet users valuing portability and cost-efficiency. On the other hand, the Anker 735 Nano 2 excels when it comes to sheer output power, multi-device charging, and ruggedness, suiting those who need versatility and higher wattage to keep laptops and multiple gadgets powered throughout their busy days.
Bottom Line
If you only need to keep your smartphone or tablet charged on the go with minimal fuss, the Anker 313 is a smart, affordable pick packed with essential safety and efficiency features. However, for anyone seeking a more robust solution capable of powering laptops alongside phones and tablets, the Anker 735 Nano 2 offers exceptional multi-port convenience, higher wattage, and better durability, making it the go-to choice for power users willing to invest a bit more.
Verdict
Winner: Anker 735 Nano 2 - Offers superior power output, versatile multi-device charging, robust durability, and laptop compatibility, perfect for demanding everyday use.
Runner-up: Anker 313 - An ultra-portable, wallet-friendly option ideal for single-device charging of phones and tablets where convenience and cost matter most.
Anker 313 was released in 2023, whereas Anker 735 Nano 2 was released in 2022, making the 313 the newer model.
The year the charger model was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Release Year on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Intended Use
What is the intended use of this charger?
75
Anker 313
0Votes
Home, Office, Travel
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Home, Office, Travel
Anker 313
Intended use includes home, office, and travel environments, highlighting versatility for various charging needs.
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger is intended for use in home, office, and travel environments, showing versatility across common charging scenarios.
Describes where and how the charger is primarily intended to be used.
In the battle of Intended Use,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Charger Type
What type of charger is this?
48
Anker 313
0Votes
Wall Charger
35
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Wall Charger
Anker 313
This is a wall charger, designed to plug directly into an AC outlet for convenient charging at fixed locations.
Defines the primary charger category based on form and usage.
In the battle of Charger Type,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charger Type on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
88
Anker 313
0Votes
AC Outlet
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
AC Outlet
Anker 735 Nano 2
Power is sourced directly from an AC outlet, the standard electrical supply found in homes and offices, ensuring broad compatibility and ease of use.
Defines where the charger draws its power from.
In the battle of Power Source,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Installation Type
How is the charger installed?
48
Anker 313
0Votes
Plug-In
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plug-In
Anker 735 Nano 2
Installation type is plug-in, indicating easy setup by directly connecting to a power outlet without additional wiring or mounting requirements.
Describes how the charger is installed or connected.
In the battle of Installation Type,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Installation Type on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Certifications
What certifications does this charger have?
26
Anker 313
0Votes
UL, FCC, CE, RoHS
68
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
UL, CE, FCC, RoHS
Anker 735 Nano 2
This charger holds several important certifications—including UL, CE, FCC, and RoHS—that demonstrate compliance with safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and environmental standards.
Lists official safety, quality, and compliance certifications held by the charger.
In the battle of Certifications,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
42 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Certifications on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Product Name
What is the product name?
68
Anker 313
0Votes
Anker 313
70
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Anker 735
vs
Product Name
The Product Name for Anker 313 is 'Anker 313' while for Anker 735 Nano 2 it is 'Anker 735'. This helps identify the models clearly for potential buyers.
Official product name used to identify the charger model.
In the battle of Product Name,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Name on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Max output power matters most to me and the Anker 735 Nano 2 really brings that with 65 watts. It feels like a better choice for fast charging overall.
Peak Power Handling is 45 Watts for Anker 313 and 65 Watts for Anker 735 Nano 2, reinforcing the stronger peak capability of the 735 Nano 2.
The maximum short-term power the charger can safely handle.
In the battle of Peak Power Handling,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
20.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Peak Power Handling on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Regulation
How good is the voltage regulation?
73
Anker 313
0Votes
Good
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Excellent
Anker 313
Voltage regulation is good, meaning the charger can maintain stable voltage output within safe limits to avoid device damage.
Anker 735 Nano 2
Voltage regulation quality is excellent, ensuring stable voltage output to prevent damage to devices and maintain efficient charging.
Indicates how well output voltage remains stable under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voltage Regulation on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Output Power
What is the minimum output power?
5
Watt
0Votes
5
Watt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
The minimum output power is 5 Watts, suitable for reliably charging smaller devices or initiating charging processes with compatible equipment.
The lowest stable power output supported by the charger.
In the battle of Minimum Output Power,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
5.00 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Output Power on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage
What input voltage does it support?
100
Volt
0Votes
100
Volt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Input voltage rating of 100 Volts corresponds to the voltage level the charger can safely accept from the power source.
The voltage range required from the power source to operate safely.
In the battle of Input Voltage,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
100.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Current
How much input current does it draw?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
1.8
A
0Votes
vs
Input Current
Anker 313 does not provide Input Current information, while Anker 735 Nano 2 has an Input Current of 1.8 Amps, indicating more detailed electrical info is available for the 735 Nano 2.
The amount of current drawn from the power source during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Current on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Voltage
What is the output voltage?
20
Volt
0Votes
20
Volt
0Votes
vs
Output Voltage
The Output Voltage for both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2 is 20 Volts, meaning output voltage is consistent across both models.
The voltage supplied to connected devices during charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
20.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Voltage on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Factor
What is the power factor?
48
Anker 313
0Votes
Medium
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Anker 735 Nano 2
The power factor is high, indicating efficient use of electrical power, reducing wasted energy and improving charger performance.
Indicates how efficiently electrical power is drawn from the power source.
In the battle of Power Factor,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
47 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Factor on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Consumption
How much power is used on standby?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.3
Watt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
The standby power consumption is very low at 0.3 Watts, which helps reduce energy waste when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging a device.
Power consumed when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Consumption on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Current Regulation
How good is the current regulation?
73
Anker 313
0Votes
Good
65
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Good
Anker 313
Current regulation is rated as good, meaning the charger provides a stable and appropriate current to connected devices, enhancing safety and performance.
Indicates how consistently current is controlled during charging.
In the battle of Current Regulation,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Current Regulation on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Frequency
What input frequency is supported?
50
Hz
0Votes
50
Hz
0Votes
The electrical frequency range the charger can accept.
In the battle of Input Frequency,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
50.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Frequency on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current
What is the output current?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3.25
A
0Votes
The maximum current delivered to devices for charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Current on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Efficiency
How efficient is the charger?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Indicates how effectively input power is converted into usable output power.
In the battle of Power Efficiency,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Efficiency on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Load Regulation
How good is the load regulation?
58
Anker 313
0Votes
Good
70
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Good
Measures output stability as load increases or decreases.
In the battle of Load Regulation,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Load Regulation on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Ripple & Noise
How much ripple and noise is present?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
Low
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Low
Indicates the level of electrical noise present in the output.
In the battle of Ripple & Noise,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ripple & Noise on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Surge Protection Rating
How strong is the surge protection?
73
Anker 313
0Votes
Enhanced
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Advanced
Indicates the strength of protection against voltage spikes.
In the battle of Surge Protection Rating,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surge Protection Rating on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Short Circuit Protection
Does it have short circuit protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
vs
Short Circuit Protection
Both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2 include Short Circuit Protection, providing important safety features during use.
Automatically shuts down power if a short circuit is detected.
In the battle of Short Circuit Protection,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Short Circuit Protection on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Prevents damage by limiting excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcurrent Protection on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it prevent overvoltage?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Protects devices from excessive voltage output.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overvoltage Protection on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Distribution Method for both models is Fixed, meaning power allocation among ports does not dynamically adjust.
Describes how power is allocated across multiple ports.
In the battle of Power Distribution Method,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Distribution Method on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2 have High Heat Management Efficiency, suggesting good safety and longevity under heavy use.
Measures how effectively heat is managed during charging.
In the battle of Heat Management Efficiency,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Management Efficiency on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Charging Speed
What is the maximum charging speed?
65
Watt
0Votes
65
Watt
0Votes
Anker 313
The maximum charging speed is 65 Watt (W), enabling support for high-power devices such as laptops and tablets.
Anker 735 Nano 2
Maximum charging speed is 65 Watts, enabling rapid charging for compatible high-power devices such as laptops and tablets.
The highest charging power delivered to a single device.
In the battle of Maximum Charging Speed,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
65.00 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Charging Speed on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Consistency
Is charging speed consistent?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
Consistent
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Consistent
vs
Charging Consistency
Charging Consistency is described as Consistent for both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating both provide stable charging performance.
Indicates how evenly charging speed is maintained throughout a session.
In the battle of Charging Consistency,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Consistency on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Speed
What is the charging speed category?
68
Anker 313
0Votes
Fast
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Ultra-Fast
Anker 313
Charging speed is classified as fast, meaning it supports rapid charging protocols to reduce device charge times significantly.
Classifies overall charging speed based on supported power and protocols.
In the battle of Charging Speed,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Speed on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Simultaneous Device Charging
How many devices can be charged simultaneously?
8
Anker 313
0Votes
1
0
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Yes
vs
Simultaneous Device Charging
Anker 313 can charge only 1 device simultaneously, whereas Anker 735 Nano 2 supports charging multiple devices simultaneously, making it more versatile for multitasking.
The maximum number of devices that can be charged at the same time.
In the battle of Simultaneous Device Charging,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Simultaneous Device Charging on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging performance?
48
Anker 313
0Votes
Stable
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Stable
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger provides stable charging stability, ensuring consistent and reliable power flow to connected devices. Stable charging is crucial for prolonging device battery life and preventing unexpected power interruptions.
Reflects how consistent charging output remains over time.
In the battle of Charging Stability,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Stability on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Throttling Behavior
How does the charger throttle performance?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
Gradual
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Gradual
Anker 735 Nano 2
Throttling behavior is gradual, meaning the charger reduces power output progressively under thermal or system stress, protecting components without abrupt interruptions.
Describes how charging speed is reduced when limits are reached.
In the battle of Throttling Behavior,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Throttling Behavior on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Charging Behavior
What happens after charging is complete?
58
Anker 313
0Votes
Standby
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Standby
vs
Idle Charging Behavior
Idle Charging Behavior for both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2 is Standby, showing they both efficiently manage power when devices are not charging.
Describes behavior when a device is fully charged but still connected.
In the battle of Idle Charging Behavior,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
27 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Idle Charging Behavior on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Intelligent Power Allocation
Does it allocate power intelligently?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Automatically adjusts power delivery based on connected devices.
In the battle of Intelligent Power Allocation,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intelligent Power Allocation on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Full Charge Time Estimate
How long does a full charge take?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
10
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Fast depending on device
Estimated time required to fully charge a typical device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Full Charge Time Estimate on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Adaptive Charging
Does it support adaptive charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Adjusts charging patterns based on device needs and conditions.
In the battle of Adaptive Charging,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adaptive Charging on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Device Detection Accuracy
How accurate is device detection?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Accuracy in identifying connected devices and their power needs.
In the battle of Device Detection Accuracy,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Detection Accuracy on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Startup Charging Delay
Is there a delay before charging starts?
No
0Votes
Anker 313
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Time taken before charging begins after a device is connected.
In the battle of Startup Charging Delay,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Startup Charging Delay on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
The Anker 313 is a bit more compact in width than the 735 Nano 2 which makes it easier to carry around in tight spaces. That pocket-friendly size is a win for me.
See more
Plug Profile Depth
How far does the plug stick out?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3.5
inch
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Plug profile depth is 3.5 inches (8.9 centimeters), which impacts how much the charger extends from the wall outlet.
Depth of the plug profile when inserted into an outlet.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Profile Depth on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth of the charger?
1.38
inch
0Votes
1.15
inch
0Votes
The front-to-back measurement of the charger body.
In the battle of Depth,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
0.2 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Thickness
How thick is the cable?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Thickness of the charging cable, affecting durability and flexibility.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Thickness on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Travel Size Classification
Is this charger travel-sized?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
Pocket
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Compact
vs
Travel Size Classification
Anker 313 is classified as Pocket Travel Size, whereas Anker 735 Nano 2 is Compact, indicating the 313 is smaller and more pocket-friendly.
Overall size category based on dimensions and portability.
In the battle of Travel Size Classification,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
43 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Size Classification on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3
ft
0Votes
vs
Drop Resistance
Drop Resistance data is not available for Anker 313 but Anker 735 Nano 2 offers resistance up to 3 feet, favoring durability for the 735 Nano 2 in accidental drops.
Maximum drop height the charger can withstand without damage.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Material Sustainability Level is Medium for both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating moderate environmental consideration in materials used.
Use of sustainable or environmentally friendly materials.
In the battle of Material Sustainability Level,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Material Sustainability Level on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Reinforcement
Are the ports reinforced?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
Reinforced
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Reinforced
Anker 313
Port reinforcement ensures the ports are strengthened to avoid damage or loosening from frequent use.
Indicates whether charging ports are reinforced for durability.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Reinforcement on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Fire-Retardant Rating
What is the fire-retardant rating?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
V-0
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
V-0
Anker 735 Nano 2
Fire-retardant rating is V-0, the highest UL 94 standard, indicating materials used resist burning and self-extinguish quickly if ignited, enhancing user safety.
Fire safety rating of the charger materials.
In the battle of Fire-Retardant Rating,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire-Retardant Rating on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Finish
What is the surface finish?
38
Anker 313
0Votes
Matte
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Matte
Anker 313
The surface finish is matte, which helps resist fingerprints and offers a subtle, non-glossy appearance.
External surface finish affecting grip and aesthetics.
In the battle of Surface Finish,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surface Finish on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Build Rigidity
How rigid is the charger build?
88
Anker 313
0Votes
Solid
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Solid
Anker 313
The build rigidity is solid, contributing to the overall durability and structural integrity of the charger.
Overall structural stiffness of the charger body.
In the battle of Build Rigidity,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Rigidity on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Material
What material is the plug made of?
48
Anker 313
0Votes
Metal, Plastic
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plastic, Metal
Material used for the plug prongs and structure.
In the battle of Plug Material,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Material on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Moisture Resistance
Is it resistant to moisture?
0
Anker 313
0Votes
None
0
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
None
Ability to withstand moisture exposure.
In the battle of Moisture Resistance,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Moisture Resistance on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
70
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Instant
vs
Protection Response Time
Protection Response Time is not specified for Anker 313 but is Instant for Anker 735 Nano 2, meaning the latter offers faster safety responses.
Time taken for protection systems to activate during a fault.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protection Response Time on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
EMI Protection
Is EMI protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Anker 313
EMI protection is included, reducing electromagnetic interference to ensure stable charging performance and limit disruption to nearby electronics.
Protects against electromagnetic interference affecting nearby electronics.
In the battle of EMI Protection,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EMI Protection on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Protection
Does it have overheat protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Automatically reduces or shuts off power when excessive heat is detected.
In the battle of Overheat Protection,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Protection on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Monitoring
Is temperature actively monitored?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Continuously monitors internal temperature during operation.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Monitoring on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Electrical Isolation
Is electrical isolation implemented?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Separates high-voltage and low-voltage components for safety.
In the battle of Electrical Isolation,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Electrical Isolation on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Grounding
Does it support grounding?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Supports grounding to reduce shock and electrical interference.
In the battle of Grounding,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
43 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grounding on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Anti-Spark Protection
Does it have anti-spark protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Reduces sparking when plugging or unplugging devices.
In the battle of Anti-Spark Protection,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Anti-Spark Protection on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
ESD Protection
Is ESD protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Shields the charger from electrostatic discharge damage.
In the battle of ESD Protection,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
ESD Protection on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-Off
Does it shut off automatically?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Automatically cuts power when unsafe conditions are detected.
In the battle of Auto Shut-Off,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-Off on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Fault Detection
Can it detect electrical faults?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Detects abnormal electrical conditions during operation.
In the battle of Fault Detection,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fault Detection on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Certification Level
What is the safety certification level?
58
Anker 313
0Votes
Enhanced
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Premium
Overall strength of safety certifications achieved.
In the battle of Safety Certification Level,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
37 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certification Level on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode
Is there a thermal fail-safe mode?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
vs
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode is present on both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2, providing thermal protection during use.
Emergency mode that safely disables charging during extreme heat.
In the battle of Thermal Fail-Safe Mode,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Laptop charging is a dealbreaker for me and only the Anker 735 Nano 2 supports it. This makes it way more versatile especially when traveling with my laptop.
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the wireless charging standard supported.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Standard on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Proprietary Protocol,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proprietary Protocol on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Cross-Brand Compatibility
How broad is cross-brand compatibility?
63
Anker 313
0Votes
Wide
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Universal
vs
Cross-Brand Compatibility
Cross-Brand Compatibility is Wide for Anker 313 and Universal for Anker 735 Nano 2, suggesting the 735 Nano 2 is compatible with a broader range of brands.
Level of compatibility across different device brands.
In the battle of Cross-Brand Compatibility,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
32 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cross-Brand Compatibility on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Throttling Threshold is 104°F for Anker 313 and significantly higher at 176°F for Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating better thermal tolerance for the 735 Nano 2.
Temperature at which charging power is reduced to prevent overheating.
In the battle of Thermal Throttling Threshold,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
72.0 °F
measurement.
Based on community votes for Thermal Throttling Threshold,
Anker 313 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Thermal throttling temp is very different here and the 735 Nano 2 handles higher heat better at 176°F. This means it should run cooler and last longer under heavy use.
Thermal Dissipation Method is Passive for both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2, meaning both rely on non-active cooling techniques.
Method used to release heat during operation.
In the battle of Thermal Dissipation Method,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
27 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Dissipation Method on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2 maintain Stable Sustained Load Temperature Stability, ensuring reliable performance under prolonged use.
Temperature stability during prolonged high-load charging.
In the battle of Sustained Load Temperature Stability,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sustained Load Temperature Stability on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
76
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
-4–140°F
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger can operate within a storage temperature range of -4–140°F (-20–60°C). This wide range facilitates safe storage in diverse environmental conditions without degradation.
Temperature range safe for storing the charger when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Cooling Design
What internal cooling design is used?
78
Anker 313
0Votes
Heat Sink
65
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Heat Sink
Anker 735 Nano 2
Internal cooling is managed by a heat sink, a passive cooling component that absorbs and disperses heat generated during charging to prolong charger lifespan.
Internal structure designed to manage heat.
In the battle of Internal Cooling Design,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Cooling Design on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Ambient Temperature Tolerance
How tolerant is it to ambient temperatures?
48
Anker 313
0Votes
Medium
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Anker 735 Nano 2
High ambient temperature tolerance means the charger can reliably function in warmer environments without risk of overheating or performance degradation.
Ability to perform in varying ambient temperatures.
In the battle of Ambient Temperature Tolerance,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
47 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ambient Temperature Tolerance on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Altitude Operating Range
What altitude can it operate at?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
5
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Up to 10,000 ft
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger is designed to operate at altitudes up to 10,000 ft (3048 meters), which is beneficial for use in high-altitude locations without performance loss.
Maximum altitude at which the charger operates reliably.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Altitude Operating Range on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Range
What is the operating temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
56
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
32–104°F
The temperature range within which the charger operates safely.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Range on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Fanless Design
Is the charger fanless?
No
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether cooling is achieved without a fan.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fanless Design on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Daily Use Convenience rates High for both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2, supporting ease of everyday operation.
Overall convenience during everyday use.
In the battle of Daily Use Convenience,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daily Use Convenience on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Plug
Does it have a foldable plug?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Anker 735 Nano 2
A foldable plug is featured, making the charger more compact and easier to transport. This design is convenient for travel, reducing the risk of damaging the plug during storage.
Indicates whether the plug can fold for easier storage and travel.
In the battle of Foldable Plug,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Plug on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Setup Complexity
How complex is setup?
48
Anker 313
0Votes
Plug-and-Play
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plug-and-Play
Anker 313
Setup complexity is plug-and-play, meaning the charger is easy to use right out of the box without requiring additional configurations.
Effort required to start using the charger.
In the battle of Setup Complexity,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
27 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Setup Complexity on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Orientation
What is the plug orientation?
28
Anker 313
0Votes
Straight
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Straight
vs
Plug Orientation
Plug Orientation is Straight for both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2, impacting how they fit into power outlets.
Orientation of the plug relative to the charger body.
In the battle of Plug Orientation,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Orientation on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicator Behavior
How do the indicators behave?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
How indicator lights behave during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Behavior on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
User Feedback Method
How does it provide user feedback?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Methods used to communicate status to the user.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Feedback Method on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
One-Hand Operation
Can it be operated with one hand?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Allows easy plugging and unplugging with one hand.
In the battle of One-Hand Operation,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-Hand Operation on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Travel Friendly
Is it travel-friendly?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
vs
Travel Friendly
Both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2 are Travel Friendly, emphasizing portability for users on the go.
Designed for easy transport and use while traveling.
In the battle of Travel Friendly,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Friendly on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Maintenance Requirements
Does it require maintenance?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
None
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
None
Level of maintenance needed to keep the charger functioning well.
In the battle of Maintenance Requirements,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maintenance Requirements on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgradable
Can the firmware be updated?
No
0Votes
Anker 313
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether the charger firmware can be updated.
In the battle of Firmware Upgradable,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgradable on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Stress Resistance is Medium for both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating moderate durability in varying conditions.
Ability to withstand heat, humidity, and other stresses.
In the battle of Environmental Stress Resistance,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Stress Resistance on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
How durable is the charging cable under repeated bending?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates how many bending cycles the charging cable can withstand before performance degradation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Flex Cycles on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Rated Lifespan
How long is the rated lifespan?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
Long
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Long
vs
Rated Lifespan
Rated Lifespan is Long for both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2, promising durable service over time.
Expected operational lifespan of the charger under normal usage conditions.
In the battle of Rated Lifespan,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rated Lifespan on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Wear Resistance
How resistant are the ports to wear?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Anker 313
Port wear resistance is high, indicating the charging ports are designed to withstand frequent plugging and unplugging without deterioration.
Resistance of charging ports to wear over time.
In the battle of Port Wear Resistance,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Wear Resistance on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Long-Term Stability
How stable is long-term performance?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
Stable
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Stable
Anker 735 Nano 2
Long-term stability refers to the charger’s ability to maintain consistent performance over extended periods without failure or efficiency loss.
Performance consistency over extended use periods.
In the battle of Long-Term Stability,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Long-Term Stability on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Manufacturing Quality Level
What is the manufacturing quality level?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
Premium
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Premium
vs
Manufacturing Quality Level
Manufacturing Quality Level is Premium for both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2, signifying high standards in production.
Overall manufacturing quality classification.
In the battle of Manufacturing Quality Level,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Manufacturing Quality Level on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Mean Time Between Failures
How reliable is the charger over time?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
vs
Mean Time Between Failures
Mean Time Between Failures is High for both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2, reflecting reliability and longevity.
Average reliability level indicating how often failures are expected.
In the battle of Mean Time Between Failures,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mean Time Between Failures on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Insertion Cycles
How durable is the plug connection over time?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
In the battle of Plug Insertion Cycles,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Insertion Cycles on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Reliability Certification
Is reliability certified?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether reliability has been independently certified.
In the battle of Reliability Certification,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Reliability Certification on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Carbon Footprint Category is Medium for both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2, reflecting typical environmental impact for similar devices.
Estimated environmental impact from production and use.
In the battle of Carbon Footprint Category,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carbon Footprint Category on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Customer Support Availability is during Business Hours for both Anker 313 and Anker 735 Nano 2, defining the times users can expect assistance.
Availability of customer support services.
In the battle of Customer Support Availability,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
33 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Customer Support Availability on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Recaptor
0
Cartling
