Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
111
Highlights
29
Differences
6
Reactions
0
Likes
Anker 313
vs
Anker 713 Nano II 45W:
111 Highlights & 29 Differences —
So, Which Charger Actually Works Better
Get a quick insight into each charger's capabilities without technical jargon. Perfect for everyday users deciding their next charger.
Which one’s your upgrade — Anker 313 or Anker 713 Nano II 45W? We compared specs like usb-c ports, wireless charging power, width & height and more to help you choose smarter.
Comparing Anker 313 vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W: Compact Chargers with Distinct Strengths
When it comes to compact, efficient charging solutions, the Anker 313 and the Anker 713 Nano II 45W both stand out as excellent choices, each embodying quality GaN technology for superior power delivery in a small footprint. Both chargers deliver a maximum 45W output power and feature compact, travel-friendly designs perfect for indoor use.
However, despite these core similarities, the key differences revolve around their port configurations, device compatibility, and charging technologies. The Anker 313, released in 2023, offers a dual-port setup including USB-C and USB-A, targeting users with a mix of older and newer devices, but lacks laptop charging support. Meanwhile, the Anker 713 Nano II 45W, introduced in 2021, excels in fast charging capabilities and includes exclusive laptop charging compatibility through its single USB-C port, making it ideal for professionals with power-hungry devices.
Innovations and Features Driving the Anker 313 Forward
The Anker 313 packs several thoughtful upgrades, primarily being the newest contender with its 2023 release year. This charger favors GaN technology alone, ensuring efficient power delivery and heat management with less energy wasted as heat (5%). Its clever inclusion of both a USB-C and USB-A port caters to a broad range of devices, especially tablets and older gadgets that do not support USB-C.
The charger houses a tough polycarbonate and plastic design offering medium scratch resistance and a medium environmental stress resistance level, providing reliability in everyday use. Additionally, it maintains thermal safety with a throttling temperature reaching 104°F, ensuring stable operation under continuous loads. Its modest weight of 0.21 lbs and pocket-sized dimensions make it a convenient option for daily carry, complemented by a reasonable price of $19.99 at Amazon.
Why the Anker 713 Nano II 45W Remains a Top Choice for Power Users
The Anker 713 Nano II 45W is tailored for users seeking fast, reliable charging for a wider range of devices, including laptops. Employing a combination of fast charging and GaN technology, it efficiently delivers steady power at a rated output of 45W. The 713 Nano II is notable for its higher thermal throttling threshold of 176°C, which means it can maintain high output for longer periods without overheating; a critical feature for heavy usage scenarios.
Its focused USB-C port supports high-voltage output (5V) designed for laptop compatibility, opening doors to use with a MacBook Pro 13, Samsung Galaxy S22, and other power-intensive devices. Weighing only 0.15 lbs and slightly more compact than the Anker 313, it benefits from a robust polycarbonate housing with a superior drop resistance rating of 3. The manufacturing quality reflects premium durability, which is bolstered by a high cable flex cycle rating and instant protection response time, ensuring quick safety cutoffs in case of faults. Priced at around $28, it caters well to those who need a reliable, travel-friendly charger for high-demand devices.
Quick Take
The Anker 313 wins points for a newer design, dual-port versatility, and affordability, making it ideal for tablet users and those with legacy USB-A devices. On the contrary, the Anker 713 Nano II 45W shines when powering laptops and users requiring fast charging at sustained loads, thanks to its elevated thermal threshold and efficient GaN-enhanced power delivery.
Bottom Line
If you're looking for a charger that packs modern tech with backward compatibility and budget-friendliness, the Anker 313 is a solid pick. But for professionals or power users needing laptop charging with advanced thermal management and faster charging protocols, the Anker 713 Nano II 45W is the superior choice despite a higher price tag. Both offer excellent reliability and compact convenience, but your device ecosystem and charging demands will guide the best selection.
Verdict
Winner: Anker 713 Nano II 45W - Its ability to charge laptops, higher thermal limits, and advanced fast charging technology make it the best all-around power adapter for demanding users.
Runner-up: Anker 313 - With newer tech, a dual-port setup including USB-A, and a more wallet-friendly price point, it's great for casual users with tablets and mixed device portfolios.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
We dove deep into Anker 313 vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W — every major spec, performance test, and design callout is here to help you pick the right charger.
75
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Fast Charging, GaN
vs
Charging Technology
Anker 313 utilizes GaN charging technology, whereas Anker 713 Nano II 45W features both Fast Charging and GaN technology. This makes the 713 Nano II more advanced in charge speed capabilities.
Indicates the core technology used to deliver power efficiently.
In the battle of Charging Technology,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Technology on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
71
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
vs
Product Name
Both Anker 313 and Anker 713 Nano II 45W are designed for beginners suitable for indoor use. The Anker 313 is a 2023 release, while the Anker 713 Nano II 45W was launched in 2021, making the 313 a more current option.
Official product name used to identify the charger model.
In the battle of Product Name,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Name on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 313 and Anker 713 Nano II 45W are intended for indoor usage environments, making them equally suitable for home or office settings without special environmental adaptations.
Specifies the environments where the charger is designed to operate.
In the battle of Usage Environment,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Usage Environment on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Intended Use
What is the intended use of this charger?
75
Anker 313
0Votes
Home, Office, Travel
70
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Home, Office, Travel
Anker 313
Intended use includes home, office, and travel environments, highlighting versatility for various charging needs.
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Designed for use in home, office, and travel environments, providing versatility across settings.
Describes where and how the charger is primarily intended to be used.
In the battle of Intended Use,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Charger Type
What type of charger is this?
48
Anker 313
0Votes
Wall Charger
45
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Wall Charger
Anker 313
This is a wall charger, designed to plug directly into an AC outlet for convenient charging at fixed locations.
Defines the primary charger category based on form and usage.
In the battle of Charger Type,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charger Type on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Release Year
What year was this charger released?
73
Anker 313
0Votes
2023
60
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
2021
vs
Release Year
Anker 313 was released in 2023, two years later than the Anker 713 Nano II 45W released in 2021. This highlights the 313 as the newer model, potentially with updated features.
The year the charger model was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Release Year on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
User Level
What user level is this charger designed for?
18
Anker 313
0Votes
Beginner
15
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Beginner
vs
User Level
User level for both Anker 313 and Anker 713 Nano II 45W is Beginner, indicating ease of use for new users across both models, ideal for those just starting with such devices.
Describes the technical experience level required to use the charger effectively.
In the battle of User Level,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Level on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Device Compatibility
What devices are compatible with this charger?
58
Anker 313
0Votes
Smartphone, Tablet
80
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop
Indicates the types of devices the charger can power.
In the battle of Device Compatibility,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Compatibility on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility Notes
Are compatibility notes clearly provided?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Indicates whether additional compatibility limitations or requirements are clearly disclosed.
In the battle of Compatibility Notes,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility Notes on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
88
Anker 313
0Votes
AC Outlet
65
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
AC Outlet
Defines where the charger draws its power from.
In the battle of Power Source,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
23 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Installation Type
How is the charger installed?
48
Anker 313
0Votes
Plug-In
35
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Plug-In
Describes how the charger is installed or connected.
In the battle of Installation Type,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Installation Type on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Style
What is the mounting style?
58
Anker 313
0Votes
Wall-Mounted
45
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Wall-Mounted
Indicates how the charger is physically positioned during use.
In the battle of Mounting Style,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Style on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Regulatory Region
Which regulatory regions does it support?
58
Anker 313
0Votes
US, EU, UK
62
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
US, EU, UK
Indicates the regions where the charger meets regulatory standards.
In the battle of Regulatory Region,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Regulatory Region on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Certifications
What certifications does this charger have?
26
Anker 313
0Votes
UL, FCC, CE, RoHS
58
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
UL, CE, FCC
Lists official safety, quality, and compliance certifications held by the charger.
In the battle of Certifications,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
32 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Certifications on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Product Form Factor
What is the product form factor?
78
Anker 313
0Votes
Ultra-Compact
45
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Compact
Describes the overall physical form and size profile of the charger.
In the battle of Product Form Factor,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
33 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Form Factor on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 313 and Anker 713 Nano II 45W offer the same maximum output power of 45 watts, meeting the needs of devices requiring high power output effectively.
The highest total power the charger can deliver to connected devices.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
equal
45.00 Watt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Maximum Output Power,
Anker 313 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Output voltage differs significantly: Anker 313 provides 20 volts, while Anker 713 Nano II 45W provides 5 volts. This makes the 313 better suited for higher voltage devices.
The voltage supplied to connected devices during charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
15.0 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Voltage on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
1.87
A
0Votes
vs
Input Current
Input current is unavailable for Anker 313, while Anker 713 Nano II 45W has an input current of 1.87 amps. This makes comparison impossible, but the 713 Nano II provides clear input current info.
The amount of current drawn from the power source during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Current on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 313 and Anker 713 Nano II 45W have short circuit protection enabled, ensuring user safety with reliable circuitry safeguards.
Automatically shuts down power if a short circuit is detected.
In the battle of Short Circuit Protection,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Short Circuit Protection on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage
What input voltage does it support?
100
Volt
0Votes
100
Volt
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Input voltage of 100 Volt supports operation in regions with this standard voltage supply.
The voltage range required from the power source to operate safely.
In the battle of Input Voltage,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
equal
100.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current
What is the output current?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
2.25
A
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
With an output current of 2.25 Ampere, the charger can support rapid charging for compatible devices.
The maximum current delivered to devices for charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Current on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Consumption
How much power is used on standby?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.1
Watt
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Standby power consumption is very low at 0.1 Watt, minimizing energy waste when the charger is not actively charging.
Power consumed when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Consumption on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Regulation
How good is the voltage regulation?
73
Anker 313
0Votes
Good
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Excellent
Anker 313
Voltage regulation is good, meaning the charger can maintain stable voltage output within safe limits to avoid device damage.
Indicates how well output voltage remains stable under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voltage Regulation on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Current Regulation
How good is the current regulation?
73
Anker 313
0Votes
Good
45
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Fast
Anker 313
Current regulation is rated as good, meaning the charger provides a stable and appropriate current to connected devices, enhancing safety and performance.
Indicates how consistently current is controlled during charging.
In the battle of Current Regulation,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
28 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Current Regulation on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Output Power
What is the minimum output power?
5
Watt
0Votes
5
Watt
0Votes
The lowest stable power output supported by the charger.
In the battle of Minimum Output Power,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
equal
5.00 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Output Power on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Input Frequency
What input frequency is supported?
50
Hz
0Votes
50
Hz
0Votes
The electrical frequency range the charger can accept.
In the battle of Input Frequency,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
equal
50.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Frequency on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Efficiency
How efficient is the charger?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
High
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
High
Indicates how effectively input power is converted into usable output power.
In the battle of Power Efficiency,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Efficiency on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Factor
What is the power factor?
48
Anker 313
0Votes
Medium
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
High
Indicates how efficiently electrical power is drawn from the power source.
In the battle of Power Factor,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
47 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Factor on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Load Regulation
How good is the load regulation?
58
Anker 313
0Votes
Good
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Excellent
Measures output stability as load increases or decreases.
In the battle of Load Regulation,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
37 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Load Regulation on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Ripple & Noise
How much ripple and noise is present?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
Low
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Low
Indicates the level of electrical noise present in the output.
In the battle of Ripple & Noise,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ripple & Noise on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Surge Protection Rating
How strong is the surge protection?
73
Anker 313
0Votes
Enhanced
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Advanced
Indicates the strength of protection against voltage spikes.
In the battle of Surge Protection Rating,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surge Protection Rating on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Prevents damage by limiting excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcurrent Protection on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it prevent overvoltage?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Protects devices from excessive voltage output.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overvoltage Protection on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 313 and Anker 713 Nano II 45W support simultaneous charging of 1 device, making them suitable for individual device charging needs.
The maximum number of devices that can be charged at the same time.
In the battle of Simultaneous Device Charging,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Simultaneous Device Charging on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Heat management efficiency is high in both Anker 313 and Anker 713 Nano II 45W, promoting safer and cooler operation under load.
Measures how effectively heat is managed during charging.
In the battle of Heat Management Efficiency,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Management Efficiency on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging consistency is consistent for both Anker 313 and Anker 713 Nano II 45W, ensuring stable and reliable power delivery throughout use.
Indicates how evenly charging speed is maintained throughout a session.
In the battle of Charging Consistency,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Consistency on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Idle charging behavior is standby mode on both Anker 313 and Anker 713 Nano II 45W, ensuring energy efficiency when not actively charging devices.
Describes behavior when a device is fully charged but still connected.
In the battle of Idle Charging Behavior,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Idle Charging Behavior on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Power distribution method is fixed for both Anker 313 and Anker 713 Nano II 45W, meaning power is allocated in a set configuration ideal for single device charging.
Describes how power is allocated across multiple ports.
In the battle of Power Distribution Method,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
28 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Distribution Method on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Charging Speed
What is the maximum charging speed?
65
Watt
0Votes
45
Watt
0Votes
Anker 313
The maximum charging speed is 65 Watt (W), enabling support for high-power devices such as laptops and tablets.
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Maximum charging speed rated at 45 Watt ensures quick and efficient charging for supported devices.
The highest charging power delivered to a single device.
In the battle of Maximum Charging Speed,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
20.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Charging Speed on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Speed
What is the charging speed category?
68
Anker 313
0Votes
Fast
55
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Fast
Anker 313
Charging speed is classified as fast, meaning it supports rapid charging protocols to reduce device charge times significantly.
Classifies overall charging speed based on supported power and protocols.
In the battle of Charging Speed,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Speed on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Throttling Behavior
How does the charger throttle performance?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
Gradual
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Gradual
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Throttling behavior is gradual, meaning the device reduces power output slowly under thermal stress to maintain safety without abrupt stops.
Describes how charging speed is reduced when limits are reached.
In the battle of Throttling Behavior,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Throttling Behavior on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Intelligent Power Allocation
Does it allocate power intelligently?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
No
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Automatically adjusts power delivery based on connected devices.
In the battle of Intelligent Power Allocation,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intelligent Power Allocation on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging performance?
48
Anker 313
0Votes
Stable
35
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Stable
Reflects how consistent charging output remains over time.
In the battle of Charging Stability,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Stability on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Full Charge Time Estimate
How long does a full charge take?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Estimated time required to fully charge a typical device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Full Charge Time Estimate on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Adaptive Charging
Does it support adaptive charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Adjusts charging patterns based on device needs and conditions.
In the battle of Adaptive Charging,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adaptive Charging on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Device Detection Accuracy
How accurate is device detection?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
High
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
High
Accuracy in identifying connected devices and their power needs.
In the battle of Device Detection Accuracy,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Detection Accuracy on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Startup Charging Delay
Is there a delay before charging starts?
No
0Votes
Anker 313
No
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Time taken before charging begins after a device is connected.
In the battle of Startup Charging Delay,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Startup Charging Delay on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum power delivered during wireless charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Power on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 313 includes 1 USB-A port whereas Anker 713 Nano II 45W has no USB-A ports, making the 313 more versatile for older USB devices.
Number of traditional USB-A output ports.
In the battle of USB-A Ports,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
equal
23 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB-A Ports on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Total Ports
How many total ports does the charger have?
18
Anker 313
0Votes
2
9
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
1
Anker 313
The charger has a total of 2 ports, allowing simultaneous charging of two devices.
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
The charger has a single charging port, suitable for basic device charging needs.
Total number of output ports available for charging devices.
In the battle of Total Ports,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Total Ports on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Type
What connector types are supported?
88
Anker 313
0Votes
USB-C
85
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
USB-C
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
This charger features a USB-C connector type, which is widely adopted for efficient data transfer and power delivery.
Types of connectors supported by the charger.
In the battle of Connector Type,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Type on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Durability
How durable are the connectors?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
High
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
High
Anker 313
Connector durability is high, ensuring that connectors maintain a secure and reliable connection over repeated use.
Durability of the connector interface itself.
In the battle of Connector Durability,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Durability on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging
Does it support wireless charging?
No
0Votes
Anker 313
No
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Indicates whether the charger supports wireless charging.
In the battle of Wireless Charging,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Detachable Cable
Is the cable detachable?
No
0Votes
Anker 313
No
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Indicates whether the charging cable can be detached.
In the battle of Detachable Cable,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Cable on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Length
How long is the charging cable?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Length of the included charging cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Interchangeable Plugs
Does it support interchangeable plugs?
No
0Votes
Anker 313
No
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
vs
Interchangeable Plugs
Neither Anker 313 nor Anker 713 Nano II 45W have interchangeable plugs, indicating no plug adaptors for different regions.
Supports interchangeable plug heads for different regions.
In the battle of Interchangeable Plugs,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interchangeable Plugs on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Pass-Through Charging
Does it support pass-through charging?
No
0Votes
Anker 313
No
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Allows the charger to power devices while itself being powered.
In the battle of Pass-Through Charging,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pass-Through Charging on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Placement
Where are the ports located?
58
Anker 313
0Votes
Front
75
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Front
Location of charging ports on the charger body.
In the battle of Port Placement,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Placement on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Labeling
Are the ports labeled?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Indicates whether ports are clearly labeled for identification.
In the battle of Port Labeling,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Labeling on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Durability
How durable are the ports?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
High
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
High
Expected resistance of ports to wear from repeated use.
In the battle of Port Durability,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Durability on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Magnetic Alignment
Does it support magnetic alignment?
No
0Votes
Anker 313
No
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Supports magnetic alignment for easier device placement.
In the battle of Magnetic Alignment,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Magnetic Alignment on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Daisy-Chain
Can it be daisy-chained?
No
0Votes
Anker 313
No
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Allows multiple chargers or devices to be linked together.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daisy-Chain on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Power Priority
How is port power priority handled?
48
Anker 313
0Votes
Fixed
45
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Fixed
Determines how power priority is assigned among ports.
In the battle of Port Power Priority,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Power Priority on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
In width, Anker 313 measures 1.49 inches while Anker 713 Nano II 45W is 1.5 inches wide, showing very similar footprint sizes suitable for minimal space usage.
The horizontal measurement of the charger body from side to side.
In the battle of Width,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
equal
1.49 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 313 and Anker 713 Nano II 45W are classified as pocket travel size, offering excellent portability for travelers.
Overall size category based on dimensions and portability.
In the battle of Travel Size Classification,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Size Classification on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth of the charger?
1.38
inch
0Votes
1.63
inch
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
The depth of the charger is 1.63 inch (approximately 4.14 cm), contributing to its small footprint.
The front-to-back measurement of the charger body.
In the battle of Depth,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
0.3 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Profile Depth
How far does the plug stick out?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
1.5
inch
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
The plug has a profile depth of 1.5 inch (approximately 3.81 cm), which affects how far it protrudes from the outlet.
Depth of the plug profile when inserted into an outlet.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Profile Depth on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Thickness
How thick is the cable?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Thickness of the charging cable, affecting durability and flexibility.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Thickness on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 313 features a polycarbonate and plastic housing, while Anker 713 Nano II 45W uses polycarbonate only, suggesting the 313 has a mixed material build.
Primary material used for the outer charger casing.
In the battle of Housing Material,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Housing Material on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3
ft
0Votes
vs
Drop Resistance
Drop resistance information is unavailable for Anker 313, while Anker 713 Nano II 45W offers up to 3 feet drop protection, enhancing durability during accidental drops.
Maximum drop height the charger can withstand without damage.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 313 and Anker 713 Nano II 45W utilize heat-resistant materials, improving durability under thermal stress.
Uses materials designed to withstand high temperatures safely.
In the battle of Heat-Resistant Materials,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat-Resistant Materials on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Both models have medium material sustainability levels, showing an average environmental consideration in their construction.
Use of sustainable or environmentally friendly materials.
In the battle of Material Sustainability Level,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Material Sustainability Level on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Reinforcement
Are the ports reinforced?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
Reinforced
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Reinforced
Anker 313
Port reinforcement ensures the ports are strengthened to avoid damage or loosening from frequent use.
Indicates whether charging ports are reinforced for durability.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Reinforcement on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Finish
What is the surface finish?
38
Anker 313
0Votes
Matte
65
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Matte
Anker 313
The surface finish is matte, which helps resist fingerprints and offers a subtle, non-glossy appearance.
External surface finish affecting grip and aesthetics.
In the battle of Surface Finish,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
27 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surface Finish on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Build Rigidity
How rigid is the charger build?
88
Anker 313
0Votes
Solid
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Solid
Anker 313
The build rigidity is solid, contributing to the overall durability and structural integrity of the charger.
Overall structural stiffness of the charger body.
In the battle of Build Rigidity,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Rigidity on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Material
What material is the plug made of?
48
Anker 313
0Votes
Metal, Plastic
55
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Metal
Material used for the plug prongs and structure.
In the battle of Plug Material,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Material on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Fire-Retardant Rating
What is the fire-retardant rating?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
V-0
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
V-0
Fire safety rating of the charger materials.
In the battle of Fire-Retardant Rating,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire-Retardant Rating on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Moisture Resistance
Is it resistant to moisture?
0
Anker 313
0Votes
None
0
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
None
Ability to withstand moisture exposure.
In the battle of Moisture Resistance,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Moisture Resistance on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Safety redundancy level is multi-layer, involving multiple protective mechanisms to safeguard against electrical faults.
Indicates the number of safety systems working together.
In the battle of Safety Redundancy Level,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Redundancy Level on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Prevents accidental insertion of objects into live ports.
In the battle of Child Safety Shutter,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Child Safety Shutter on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
75
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Instant
Time taken for protection systems to activate during a fault.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protection Response Time on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Emergency mode that safely disables charging during extreme heat.
In the battle of Thermal Fail-Safe Mode,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
EMI Protection
Is EMI protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Anker 313
EMI protection is included, reducing electromagnetic interference to ensure stable charging performance and limit disruption to nearby electronics.
Protects against electromagnetic interference affecting nearby electronics.
In the battle of EMI Protection,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EMI Protection on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Protection
Does it have overheat protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Automatically reduces or shuts off power when excessive heat is detected.
In the battle of Overheat Protection,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Protection on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Monitoring
Is temperature actively monitored?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Continuously monitors internal temperature during operation.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Monitoring on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Electrical Isolation
Is electrical isolation implemented?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Separates high-voltage and low-voltage components for safety.
In the battle of Electrical Isolation,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Electrical Isolation on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Grounding
Does it support grounding?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
No
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Supports grounding to reduce shock and electrical interference.
In the battle of Grounding,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grounding on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Anti-Spark Protection
Does it have anti-spark protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Reduces sparking when plugging or unplugging devices.
In the battle of Anti-Spark Protection,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Anti-Spark Protection on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
ESD Protection
Is ESD protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Shields the charger from electrostatic discharge damage.
In the battle of ESD Protection,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
ESD Protection on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-Off
Does it shut off automatically?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Automatically cuts power when unsafe conditions are detected.
In the battle of Auto Shut-Off,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-Off on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Fault Detection
Can it detect electrical faults?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Detects abnormal electrical conditions during operation.
In the battle of Fault Detection,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fault Detection on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Certification Level
What is the safety certification level?
58
Anker 313
0Votes
Enhanced
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Premium
Overall strength of safety certifications achieved.
In the battle of Safety Certification Level,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
37 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certification Level on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the wireless charging standard supported.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Standard on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Maintains compatibility with older charging standards and devices.
In the battle of Backward Compatibility,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Backward Compatibility on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Level of compatibility across different device brands.
In the battle of Cross-Brand Compatibility,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
32 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cross-Brand Compatibility on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
PPS
Does it support PPS?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Anker 313
PPS (Programmable Power Supply) support is included, enabling flexible voltage and current adjustments for safer and faster charging.
Supports Programmable Power Supply for efficient fast charging.
In the battle of PPS,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
PPS on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Laptop Charging
Can it charge laptops?
No
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
1Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Indicates whether the charger can power laptops.
In the battle of Laptop Charging,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
.
Based on community votes for Laptop Charging,
Anker 313 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉,
which got 1 votes.
In the battle of Proprietary Protocol,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proprietary Protocol on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Thermal Dissipation Method,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Dissipation Method on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature stability during prolonged high-load charging.
In the battle of Sustained Load Temperature Stability,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sustained Load Temperature Stability on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
55
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
-4–140°F
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
The storage temperature range is from -4 to 140°F (approximately -20 to 60°C), ensuring the device can be safely stored in various climates.
Temperature range safe for storing the charger when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Cooling Design
What internal cooling design is used?
78
Anker 313
0Votes
Heat Sink
35
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Heat Sink
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
An internal heat sink is used for cooling, helping maintain optimal operating temperatures silently.
Internal structure designed to manage heat.
In the battle of Internal Cooling Design,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
43 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Cooling Design on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Range
What is the operating temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
75
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
32–104°F
The temperature range within which the charger operates safely.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Range on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Fanless Design
Is the charger fanless?
No
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Indicates whether cooling is achieved without a fan.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fanless Design on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Ambient Temperature Tolerance
How tolerant is it to ambient temperatures?
48
Anker 313
0Votes
Medium
45
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Medium
Ability to perform in varying ambient temperatures.
In the battle of Ambient Temperature Tolerance,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ambient Temperature Tolerance on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Altitude Operating Range
What altitude can it operate at?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum altitude at which the charger operates reliably.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Altitude Operating Range on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Designed for easy transport and use while traveling.
In the battle of Travel Friendly,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Friendly on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Setup Complexity
How complex is setup?
48
Anker 313
0Votes
Plug-and-Play
85
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Plug-and-Play
Anker 313
Setup complexity is plug-and-play, meaning the charger is easy to use right out of the box without requiring additional configurations.
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Plug-and-Play setup means the charger is ready to use immediately after plugging in without complicated configuration.
Effort required to start using the charger.
In the battle of Setup Complexity,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
37 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Setup Complexity on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
User Feedback Method
How does it provide user feedback?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
70
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
LED
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
User feedback is provided via LED indicators, making it easy to see the charging status at a glance.
Methods used to communicate status to the user.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Feedback Method on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Plug
Does it have a foldable plug?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Indicates whether the plug can fold for easier storage and travel.
In the battle of Foldable Plug,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Plug on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Indicator Behavior
How do the indicators behave?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 313
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
How indicator lights behave during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Behavior on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
One-Hand Operation
Can it be operated with one hand?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Allows easy plugging and unplugging with one hand.
In the battle of One-Hand Operation,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-Hand Operation on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Maintenance Requirements
Does it require maintenance?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
None
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
None
Level of maintenance needed to keep the charger functioning well.
In the battle of Maintenance Requirements,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maintenance Requirements on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Daily Use Convenience
How convenient is it for daily use?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
High
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
High
Overall convenience during everyday use.
In the battle of Daily Use Convenience,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daily Use Convenience on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgradable
Can the firmware be updated?
No
0Votes
Anker 313
No
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Indicates whether the charger firmware can be updated.
In the battle of Firmware Upgradable,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgradable on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Average reliability level indicating how often failures are expected.
In the battle of Mean Time Between Failures,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mean Time Between Failures on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Ability to withstand heat, humidity, and other stresses.
In the battle of Environmental Stress Resistance,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Stress Resistance on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Manufacturing Quality Level,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Manufacturing Quality Level on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Rated Lifespan
How long is the rated lifespan?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
Long
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Long
Anker 313
Rated lifespan is long, indicating the charger is built to endure extended usage without performance degradation.
Expected operational lifespan of the charger under normal usage conditions.
In the battle of Rated Lifespan,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rated Lifespan on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Wear Resistance
How resistant are the ports to wear?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
High
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
High
Anker 313
Port wear resistance is high, indicating the charging ports are designed to withstand frequent plugging and unplugging without deterioration.
Resistance of charging ports to wear over time.
In the battle of Port Wear Resistance,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Wear Resistance on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Long-Term Stability
How stable is long-term performance?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
Stable
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
Stable
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Long-term stability ensures consistent performance over extended periods without degradation.
Performance consistency over extended use periods.
In the battle of Long-Term Stability,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Long-Term Stability on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Insertion Cycles
How durable is the plug connection over time?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
High
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
In the battle of Plug Insertion Cycles,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Insertion Cycles on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Reliability Certification
Is reliability certified?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 313
Yes
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Indicates whether reliability has been independently certified.
In the battle of Reliability Certification,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Reliability Certification on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Overall classification of how efficiently the charger converts power.
In the battle of Energy Efficiency Rating,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Efficiency Rating on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Estimated environmental impact from production and use.
In the battle of Carbon Footprint Category,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
13 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carbon Footprint Category on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Built-in features designed to reduce energy consumption.
In the battle of Energy Saving Features,
Anker 313 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Saving Features on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Star Compliance
Is it Energy Star compliant?
No
0Votes
Anker 313
No
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Indicates compliance with Energy Star efficiency standards.
In the battle of Energy Star Compliance,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Star Compliance on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Efficiency
How efficient is the charger in standby mode?
98
Anker 313
0Votes
High
95
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
0Votes
High
Indicates how efficiently the charger uses power while plugged in but not actively charging.
In the battle of Standby Efficiency,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Efficiency on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Eco Mode
Does it support eco mode?
No
0Votes
Anker 313
No
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Reduces power consumption when full charging is not required.
In the battle of Eco Mode,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Eco Mode on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Green Materials Usage
Are green materials used?
No
0Votes
Anker 313
No
0Votes
Anker 713 Nano II 45W
Uses environmentally friendly or recycled materials.
In the battle of Green Materials Usage,
Anker 313 ◉ is
same as
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Green Materials Usage on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Customer Support Availability,
Anker 313 ◉ is
better than
Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉
, delivering
higher
23 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Customer Support Availability on Anker 313 ◉
vs Anker 713 Nano II 45W ◉ and help others decide!
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
